Yet another foodscare :-(
Moderators: karadekoolaid, THE MOD TEAM, Stokey Sue, Gillthepainter
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I suppose this comes under this category, although at the other end of the supply chain!
"Two amputations a week: the cost of working in a US meat plant "
https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... stry-plant
From my memories of "proper butchers" back in the old days, I seem to remember it was quite common for butchers to be missing a finger or two, certainly my local one had a few short of a full complement. He ended up working at Tesco as a "pretend butcher" when the superstore which opened 5 minutes down the road killed his business.
"Two amputations a week: the cost of working in a US meat plant "
https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... stry-plant
From my memories of "proper butchers" back in the old days, I seem to remember it was quite common for butchers to be missing a finger or two, certainly my local one had a few short of a full complement. He ended up working at Tesco as a "pretend butcher" when the superstore which opened 5 minutes down the road killed his business.
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
It doesn't surprise me Sakkarin considering reports on the Net about the various dangers in the US meat packing industry, often due to short cuts (ignoring safety procedures) taken to ensure that imposed targets are met. The overseer with a whip doesn't seem to be unheard of this country either.
To me it's the wrong way round. Food should cost what it costs, not competition-driven artificially lowered prices which cause shoppers to zoom about like balls on a pinboard machine looking for bargains rather than quality. No wonder consumers also are less healthy these days eh?
Strangely enough, top executives if taken to task are always suitably "surprised and shocked" that such could possibly happen in factories for which they set targets, including that illegal workers with no rights could possibly be working on their production lines.
To me it's the wrong way round. Food should cost what it costs, not competition-driven artificially lowered prices which cause shoppers to zoom about like balls on a pinboard machine looking for bargains rather than quality. No wonder consumers also are less healthy these days eh?
Strangely enough, top executives if taken to task are always suitably "surprised and shocked" that such could possibly happen in factories for which they set targets, including that illegal workers with no rights could possibly be working on their production lines.
- Joanbunting
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: Provence
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Not that I would eat the things anyway but this one sounds alarmingif you an American cereal eater.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44819227
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44819227
Cooking for those you care about is the most profound expression of love - Anne-Sophie Pic
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Interesting, yet perplexing as to why only that particular cereal, unless the source factory is responsible and supplies to all the 33 states reported.
Meanwhile, a link here says (last two paragraphs) that breakfast cereal sales have been steadily in decline since 2010:
https://www.thestreet.com/investing/kel ... l-14623635
Meanwhile, a link here says (last two paragraphs) that breakfast cereal sales have been steadily in decline since 2010:
https://www.thestreet.com/investing/kel ... l-14623635
- Stokey Sue
- Posts: 8629
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:02 pm
- Location: Stoke Newington, London
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I don't think I know anyone who eats conventional Kellog's type cereal, though muesli granola are around
Interesting how salmonella could get into something like this - pure guess but vermin might be a source, as might a flavouring syrup the puffed wheat is sprayed with - my assumption is that freshly puffed wheat is likely to be sterile as it is done at a high temperature
Interesting how salmonella could get into something like this - pure guess but vermin might be a source, as might a flavouring syrup the puffed wheat is sprayed with - my assumption is that freshly puffed wheat is likely to be sterile as it is done at a high temperature
- strictlysalsaclare
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:06 pm
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I found out about another food scare on Thursday in work. There is an ongoing investigation into an outbreak of listeria across Europe, including the UK, leading to a number of frozen food products being recalled by supermarkets. I did look listeria up on Wikipedia to see if gets destroyed when heated to a certain temperature. Thankfully it does, at 73 deg C although it would be wonderful if Stokey Sue can assist here - my scientific knowledge is nowhere near good enough! Anyway, below is a link to a list of retailers that have been affected by this.
https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/ale ... 8-update-1
https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/ale ... 8-update-1
- Stokey Sue
- Posts: 8629
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:02 pm
- Location: Stoke Newington, London
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Listeria does get destroyed by heat quite easily, like many bacteria, but I'm not sure you'd cook frozen mixed veg for long enough to be sure of getting them all
However the big problem I suspect would be handling the food before it is cooked, I'm sure I'm not the only person who has sprinkled tiny ice crystals round the kitchen while pouring out the veg, not worth the risk for a pack of frozen sweetcorn IMO, and that seems to be the official advice
For most people an attack of listeriosis is unpleasant but not dangerous, you'd probably describe it as "gastric flu" or similar, however it is really dangerous for the pregnant, the frail elderly, new-borns and anyone with poor immunity
NHS advice
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Listeriosis/
However the big problem I suspect would be handling the food before it is cooked, I'm sure I'm not the only person who has sprinkled tiny ice crystals round the kitchen while pouring out the veg, not worth the risk for a pack of frozen sweetcorn IMO, and that seems to be the official advice
For most people an attack of listeriosis is unpleasant but not dangerous, you'd probably describe it as "gastric flu" or similar, however it is really dangerous for the pregnant, the frail elderly, new-borns and anyone with poor immunity
NHS advice
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Listeriosis/
- strictlysalsaclare
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:06 pm
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Thank you for the above info Sue!
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
[quote="Stokey Sue"]...[clip]...
However the big problem I suspect would be handling the food before it is cooked, I'm sure I'm not the only person who has sprinkled tiny ice crystals round the kitchen while pouring out the veg, not worth the risk for a pack of frozen sweetcorn IMO, and that seems to be the official advice. ...[clip]...
? Do you mean pre-frozen possibly contaminated droplets that won't be cooked but just slurped around during cleaning up? If so, then I suppose that's a vote for antibacterial clean-up surface sprays, as opposed to a bit of muck resilience building.
However the big problem I suspect would be handling the food before it is cooked, I'm sure I'm not the only person who has sprinkled tiny ice crystals round the kitchen while pouring out the veg, not worth the risk for a pack of frozen sweetcorn IMO, and that seems to be the official advice. ...[clip]...
? Do you mean pre-frozen possibly contaminated droplets that won't be cooked but just slurped around during cleaning up? If so, then I suppose that's a vote for antibacterial clean-up surface sprays, as opposed to a bit of muck resilience building.
- Stokey Sue
- Posts: 8629
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:02 pm
- Location: Stoke Newington, London
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
jeral wrote:
? Do you mean pre-frozen possibly contaminated droplets that won't be cooked but just slurped around during cleaning up? If so, then I suppose that's a vote for antibacterial clean-up surface sprays, as opposed to a bit of muck resilience building.
Yes, everything inside the p ack will be contaminated, including water or ice, and of course anything like a measuring cup or scales can get contaminated. Clean up would be possible, but probably nit woeth it for a pack of veg,better to leave it sealed
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Now they're getting really grumpy about sausages and bacon
Making me feel guilty about the gorgeous bacon ribs I had last night...
And making me fancy another batch now.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... tudy-finds
Making me feel guilty about the gorgeous bacon ribs I had last night...
And making me fancy another batch now.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... tudy-finds
- Joanbunting
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: Provence
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I heard this on R4 this morning and thought "Here we go again" I am sure the written report makes things a lot clearer and that the press and I suspect that, as usual the media/ press have just grabbed the headlines and forgotten that the whole diet has to be considered. So, if as the spokesperson is correct if you have your bacon sandwich in a multi-grain roll or bread then you are greatly reducing whatever risks there are.
We have a friend who is so terrified of eating any processed or red meat she won't even touch a large green salad with a sprinkling of crispy pancetta bits.
We have a friend who is so terrified of eating any processed or red meat she won't even touch a large green salad with a sprinkling of crispy pancetta bits.
Cooking for those you care about is the most profound expression of love - Anne-Sophie Pic
- Stokey Sue
- Posts: 8629
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:02 pm
- Location: Stoke Newington, London
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Remember the 5% increase is a 5% increase in the risk, it doesn’t mean an extra 5% of people
If the baseline risk in people who don’t eat those salted meat products is that 30 in 1000 will get the disease, a 5% increase in risk means 31 or 32 people in 1000 may get ill
It does not mean that an additional 5% of all people will suffer, which would be an extra 50 people in every 1000, but the scaremongers talk as if it did
Just had 2 Heck sausages for lunch, quite nice but I prefer a coarser, less homogeneous, banger.
If the baseline risk in people who don’t eat those salted meat products is that 30 in 1000 will get the disease, a 5% increase in risk means 31 or 32 people in 1000 may get ill
It does not mean that an additional 5% of all people will suffer, which would be an extra 50 people in every 1000, but the scaremongers talk as if it did
Just had 2 Heck sausages for lunch, quite nice but I prefer a coarser, less homogeneous, banger.
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I tried those Heck sausages the other day and was not impressed, too tight grained, as if they'd been overworked. Made me suspect that it disguised poorer quality meat. I think they had a tougher casing than I'd like as well.
Also tried Asda finest 97%, better than Heck but not quite as good as Sainos/Tesco finest.
EDIT: By "sausages", I mean pork sausages. Are beef sausages proper sausages?
Also tried Asda finest 97%, better than Heck but not quite as good as Sainos/Tesco finest.
EDIT: By "sausages", I mean pork sausages. Are beef sausages proper sausages?
- Pepper Pig
- Posts: 4920
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:52 pm
- Location: North West London
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Heck are highly recommended by the main slimming groups. They are almost totally fat free and high percentage meat. If you are a sausage lover they are never going to fit the bill.
- Alexandria
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:19 pm
- Location: Barcelona
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Sakkarin,
In Spain, there are Vegan, Vegetable, Seafood, Fish, Lamb and Beef sausages for those who do not eat pork.
They are the same basic process, however, the filling is different and perhaps the casing for religious dietary laws.
I have never tried them so I am unaware of the tasting profiles.
Have a nice evening ..
In Spain, there are Vegan, Vegetable, Seafood, Fish, Lamb and Beef sausages for those who do not eat pork.
They are the same basic process, however, the filling is different and perhaps the casing for religious dietary laws.
I have never tried them so I am unaware of the tasting profiles.
Have a nice evening ..
Barcelona, soulful & spirited, filled with fine art, amazing architecture, profoundly steeped in culture & history, and it engages all your senses, and food fancies.
- Stokey Sue
- Posts: 8629
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:02 pm
- Location: Stoke Newington, London
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I think Sakkarin was joking Member 461
Traditional English frying or grilling sausages are usually made from pork, and you expect a pork sausage if just offered “sausages” without the meat being specified. But beef sausages of a similar type are also traditional, and very popular in Scotland I believe
But sausages of many types are made and sold, lamb, chicken, turkey etc. There’s a different traditional pork sausage called a saveloy that is boiled, like a frankfurter
I had a very nice pure beef hot dog on Monday
And of course we can buy sausages that aren’t traditionally British, such as chorizo, merguez, Toulouse etc.
Traditional English frying or grilling sausages are usually made from pork, and you expect a pork sausage if just offered “sausages” without the meat being specified. But beef sausages of a similar type are also traditional, and very popular in Scotland I believe
But sausages of many types are made and sold, lamb, chicken, turkey etc. There’s a different traditional pork sausage called a saveloy that is boiled, like a frankfurter
I had a very nice pure beef hot dog on Monday
And of course we can buy sausages that aren’t traditionally British, such as chorizo, merguez, Toulouse etc.
- Gillthepainter
- Posts: 3719
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:53 am
- Location: near some lakes
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
I find myself wondering who and where these headlines are targetting.
The masses?
The Government to reduce their guideline numbers.
Dieters, as diet is big business.
Everyone.
Alcohol drinkers, you're doomed. As alcohol always slips in there as the ultimate nasty. But the report doesn't concern alcohol.
Flaws, as they cannot be sure what people eat and don't eat on these studies to be honest, due to under reporting. 20st chap swears he eats 1500 calories a day?
Not me?
I don't like sausages and bacon.
It all seems so fake.
I just cannot take it seriously enough to change what I eat.
The masses?
The Government to reduce their guideline numbers.
Dieters, as diet is big business.
Everyone.
Alcohol drinkers, you're doomed. As alcohol always slips in there as the ultimate nasty. But the report doesn't concern alcohol.
Flaws, as they cannot be sure what people eat and don't eat on these studies to be honest, due to under reporting. 20st chap swears he eats 1500 calories a day?
Not me?
I don't like sausages and bacon.
It all seems so fake.
I just cannot take it seriously enough to change what I eat.
- strictlysalsaclare
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:06 pm
Re: Yet another foodscare :-(
Whenever I read these reports I always wonder who has sponsored the study. Also, like you Gill I take them all with a large pinch of salt.
Return to Food Chat & Chatterbox
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests